Wordfast classic how do i know is tm is active

WORDFAST CLASSIC HOW DO I KNOW IS TM IS ACTIVE FULL
WORDFAST CLASSIC HOW DO I KNOW IS TM IS ACTIVE SOFTWARE
WORDFAST CLASSIC HOW DO I KNOW IS TM IS ACTIVE CODE

Am I saying that an 85% fuzzy match will not ever be a time-saver? No. Presently, we are living with the consequences of marketing lies introduced and perpetrated by an industry technology вЂњleaderвЂќ whom I am sure we can all name. Real time savings are achieved consistently only with large blocks of 100% context matches. I look at this technology more as a quality assurance tool for ensuring consistency. So often I find that a 90% match takes longer to adapt than to translate from scratch that I consider a discount out of the question. Your observations about the time involved in editing fuzzy matches is the same as mine in many instances.

How I deal with this depends very much on which client is involved, but where some sort of scale is involved, it is usually with my content or content I have approved.

Categorized: Clients, Marketing, Money Reader Interactions.

But because IвЂ™ve run the numbers on the time it takes to edit fuzzy matches, I donвЂ™t offer TM discounts other than this. I feel that for clients who put in the work to maintain a reliable TM, this is a fair compromise.

WORDFAST CLASSIC HOW DO I KNOW IS TM IS ACTIVE CODE

Meaning that in Wordfast Classic, if a segment shows up green (WordfastвЂ™s color code for a 100% match), I just click Alt-down (WordfastвЂ™s command for accepting a segment) without reading it. Therefore, the only TM discount that I offer is that if the client is extremely confident in the reliability of the TM that they provide, I will not charge for 100% matches if I accept them without proofreading them. anything below 100%) takes at least as long and sometimes longer than just translating the segment from scratch. But I find that editing fuzzy matches (i.e.

WORDFAST CLASSIC HOW DO I KNOW IS TM IS ACTIVE SOFTWARE

software and documentation), the situation may be different from what I experience. Over the years, IвЂ™ve struggled with the issue of TM discounts. The time that I save by using the TM is a result of this investment, and I want to realize the benefit of it. I pay for the upgrades and for the computer system that runs the TM. Translator says: I purchased the TM tool and used my own time to learn to use it.

WORDFAST CLASSIC HOW DO I KNOW IS TM IS ACTIVE FULL

Agency says: if some of the content in this document is recycled from a TM that we provide, why should we pay the translatorвЂ™s full rate for the recycled portion? The TM is the result of work that we paid for originally, so we want to realize the benefit of it.

There are two basic sides to the TM discount debate: In those cases, IвЂ™m all about TM leverage. These might involve multiple countries submitting funding applications using the same template, so it would be a huge waste of time to start each application from scratch. I work on several recurring projects for international development entities. That being said, there are some projects where it would be suicidal not to use a TM. I do gain a pretty significant speed advantage when using TM, but I find that if the document needs to sound really natural in English, the extra editing time eats up the time I saved during the translation. I find that because of the вЂњchunkedвЂќ nature of working in a TM tool, the flow of my writing really suffers when I use one. However because my favorite kind of work is translation that requires excellent writing, I only use TM when necessary. I own and use both OmegaT and Wordfast, and I really like both of them for different reasons. I feel a can of worms about to open here, but IвЂ™ll inject some of my thoughts on TM discounts.ДЇirst caveat: I am neither a huge fan of nor a heavy user of TM. During the recent discussion on volume discounts, a number of readers brought up the (very valid) issue of translation memory discounts.

Wordfast classic how do i know is tm is active